| 
	
 | 
| Home - Industry Article - May 08 Issue | 
 
Top 10 Laws for Being ‘SaaS-y’  | 
 
By Byron Deeter, Partner, Bessemer Venture 
Partners
  Running an 
				on-demand company means abandoning many of the long-held tenets 
				of software management and adhering to these new principles. 
				 In the emerging sector of Software as a Service, one of the 
				biggest challenges for many of the top CEOs is the lack of 
				successful role-model businesses. There are still only a handful 
				of public pure-play SaaS businesses, and thus the body of ‘best 
				practices’ is very limited. Ironically, on top of this, one of 
				the hardest things veteran software CEOs have to do when they 
				start to run a SaaS company is to forget much of what they know 
				about running a software company.
  As we worked with our SaaS portfolio companies, it became 
				apparent that savvy SaaS companies were following a new set of 
				rules – most of which didn’t apply in the traditional software 
				world, and many of which they were making up in real-time. We 
				then set out to capture the new ‘best practices’ of the 
				on-demand model. 
  To pull these insights together, Bessemer studied over a hundred 
				SaaS companies – both pure-plays and hybrids – and recently 
				hosted an invitation-only SaaS CEO Summit to compare 
				perspectives and discuss the findings. Many of the insights 
				gained during this research and these discussions are condensed 
				into the following list of ten new ‘laws,’ which help govern the 
				success of SaaS companies.
				
				
					- 
					
Your Key Business Metrics Are: CMRR (Contracted Monthly Recurring Revenue) and Cash – 
				‘Bookings’ Are for Suckers.   
  All insightful, experienced software executives know that there 
				is a single critical metric by which the health of a 
				growth-software business can be judged: ‘Bookings.’ However, in 
				the SaaS world, ‘bookings’ is ambiguous at best and often very 
				misleading. A simple example would be if Customer A signs a 
				one-year deal at $10,000 per month, and Customer B signs a 
				three-year deal at $5,000 per month. The traditional metric of 
				Bookings would value Customer A at $120,000 and Customer B at 
				$180,000, despite the fact that any good SaaS CEO knows that 
				Customer A is much more valuable to the business as they will 
				likely generate $360,000 of revenue for the business with 
				renewals over that same three year period.
  To achieve better business visibility, top-performing SaaS 
				companies have begun to focus on Monthly Recurring Revenue 
				instead of bookings. We recommend companies actually take this a 
				step further and keep a forward view of ‘contracted’ monthly 
				recurring revenue net of the expected churn. This metric, 
				Contracted Monthly Recurring Revenue (CMRR), is the single most 
				important metric for a SaaS business to monitor as the change in 
				CMRR provides the clearest visibility into the health of any 
				SaaS business. 
  Visibility into the current cash position and the change in the 
				cash position has always been important for software executives, 
				but is even more critical for SaaS businesses because the 
				working capital requirements are higher and the payment terms 
				are much longer. Given the high cost of capital for private SaaS 
				companies, wise executives will often offer slight MRR discounts 
				to customers in exchange for quarterly or annual pre-payment 
				terms. 
  A third metric to watch is customer churn, which is embedded 
				into our CMRR metric at the top level but should also be tracked 
				in deep detail by the management team. SaaS companies have to 
				remember the ‘Service’ in ‘Software-as-a-Service.’ It’s very 
				difficult and expensive to grow subscription businesses if you 
				have moderate customer churn, and prohibitive, if your churn is 
				high. The top performing SaaS companies typically achieve annual 
				renewals on a customer count basis above 90% (much of which is 
				often due to bankruptcies, acquisitions, and other events beyond 
				the company’s control), and over 100% renewals on a dollar value 
				basis due to up-sells into this installed base.
  We believe in these metrics as SaaS value drivers so strongly, 
				that like to see executive teams tie their annual bonuses 
				directly these metrics almost exclusively. 
					
					It Takes At Least $300K of CMRR to Climb the Sales Learning 
				Curve – Stop at Three Sales Reps until At Least Two of Them Are 
				Making $100K MRR Quotas. 
  Years ago, Bessemer was fortunate to invest behind Mark Leslie 
				at Veritas and as a result our firm became big believers in a 
				concept Mark helped pioneer around the Sales Learning Curve (SLC). 
				The core concept is that software organizations often fail 
				because they staff up their sales efforts too quickly and make 
				them too large before the sales model has been refined.
  The SLC worked well in the traditional enterprise software 
				business and works well for the SaaS model – with a few key 
				modifications. To understand when the business has started to 
				climb the sales learning curve and is in a position to hire more 
				reps profitably, you have to think in terms of CMRR instead of 
				bookings. You know you can profitably scale sales when a couple 
				of sales reps are at an annualized run rate to sign annual 
				contract values (MRR x 12 months) equal to twice their 
				fully-burdened cost of sales. For a direct, enterprise sales 
				business model, this is likely to be $80,000 – 100,000 MRR 
				(approx. $1 – 1.2M annualized), and for tele-sales models, this 
				may scale down to $60,000 – $75,000 MRR ($720,000 – $900,000 
				annualized). It is usually time to accelerate sales hiring when 
				at least two out of three sales reps are hitting quotas at these 
				numbers, and the business has at least $300,000 of CMRR. 
					
					Separate Your ‘Hunters’ and ‘Farmers’ – As Soon As You’ve 
				Climbed the Sales Learning Curve, Begin Ramping Your Sales Force 
				by Hiring Renewal-Oriented Account Managers. Keep the Hunters 
				Moving, and Let Farmers Tend to the Crops. 
  When a SaaS company starts to hit the sales inflection point, it 
				is important to keep the new business reps (the ‘hunters’) busy 
				with finding new deals, while a team of account managers (the 
				‘farmers’) tends the established customers. CMRR is a function 
				of new sales net of churn from your existing accounts, so you 
				should have dedicated experts for each of these two revenue 
				groups as soon as is practically possible. Once a company has a 
				few sales reps achieving quota and a significant customer base, 
				it is time to hire dedicated account management experts who are 
				compensated to focus exclusively on customer service, renewals 
				and upsells. These farmers should be compensated on the net 
				change in CMRR among their installed base accounts. 
					
					It’s a Whole New Ecosystem – Channels Are Very Hard for SaaS 
				Companies to Build, So Don’t Base Your Plan on SIs and 
				Traditional ISVs. You Will Need to Sell Directly for a Long 
				Time.   SaaS products, by their nature, don’t require massive amounts of 
				systems integration (SI) work to implement, so they’re not a 
				great fit with the traditional SI business model. They don’t 
				pull through large stacks of hardware boxes and software 
				licenses so they’re not very attractive to traditional 
				independent software vendor (ISV) partners either. Channel 
				relationships are very hard for any small company to establish, 
				but even more difficult for most SaaS companies given the 
				restricted value proposition to the SI and ISV community. 
					 Unfortunately, many software executives have spent years 
				building deep relationships with executives at the major 
				software and integration companies like IBM, Oracle, HP, and 
				Accenture…only to find they aren’t much help to SaaS businesses. 
					 Most SaaS businesses have to be comfortable with the fact that 
				they will live or die by their ability to sell directly, and 
				only if they are successful alone will they be able to build 
				meaningful channel relationships with the new generation of 
				partners and resellers. In the interim, many SaaS businesses 
				focus on joint sales and marketing activities with the emerging 
				SaaS incumbents (Salesforce.com, Webex, etc.) and the new 
				generation of smaller, more nimble and SaaS-savvy SI firms. 
					
					Stay Local – Prove Your Business in North America First. Only 
				After Reaching $1M in CMRR Should You Consider Hiring European 
				Sales and Services Execs behind Customer Demand. Save Asia for 
				Post-IPO.    Almost all businesses will look to go global at some point if 
				they continue to grow. But SaaS vendors face more barriers to 
				globalization than traditional software companies because you 
				can’t just localize the UI and ship a new CD to some remote 
				country. Given the different architecture and high service-level 
				expectations in the SaaS industry, companies are faced with 
				questions about latency, data access and security through 
				replicated local datacenters, in-country customer support 
				personnel, packaged integration with other regional software and 
				SaaS products, and other similar issues. 
  Simply put, North America is a massive market with a rising tide 
				around SaaS. There is no need to go global early and force this 
				cost and complexity upon your organization. A rough rule of 
				thumb is that you should look to pass $1M CMRR ($12M annualized) 
				before even considering Europe, and even then you should let 
				customer deals pull you into the region as you incrementally 
				hire sales and services professionals. Unless you have some 
				extremely unfair advantage in Asia, wait until Europe is a clear 
				home run before even considering opening up a sales war on 
				another front. Your default position should be to consider 
				Europe as your pre-IPO growth story, and Asia only after you’re 
				a high-flying public company. 
					
					One Datacenter – Invest Early in Backup and Disaster 
				Recovery, but Stick to One Data Center, At Least until Well 
				After IPO.    SaaS companies have this debate all the time, and yet the recent 
				data is pretty clear: Most SaaS companies can get by with a 
				single datacenter in North America until well past their IPO. In 
				fact, Salesforce.com is approaching $1billion in revenue and 
				just recently announced plans for additional datacenters.  
					 Data centers are extremely expensive and create significant 
				organizational complexity on every level. Many of the historical 
				issues around data backup, disaster recovery, and global 
				application latency that caused companies to add a second 
				datacenter can also now be better addressed in other ways. 
					
					Single Instance, Multi-Tenant – Have Only One Version of the 
				Code in Production. Really. ‘Just Say No’ to On-Premise 
				Deployments.    This is a guiding architectural principle for best-of-breed SaaS 
				companies. The notion of multi-instance, single tenant situation 
				only applies to legacy software companies moving to a dedicated 
				hosting model because they don’t have the luxury of an 
				architectural re-design. It is possible to use virtualization to 
				provide multiple instances, but this hybrid strategy is very 
				inferior for the organization. If designing a SaaS product out 
				of the gate, the best situation is single instance, 
				multi-tenant. It is a hard and fast law that shouldn’t be 
				debated. Any CTO who thinks otherwise (for a conventional 
				use-case) should be fired. 
					
					By Definition, Your Sales Prospects Are Online – Savvy Online 
				Marketing is a Core Competence (Sometimes the Only One) of Every 
				Successful SaaS Business.    You sell a product that requires an Internet connection and a 
				web browser for access, which means your prospects are online! 
				Numerous studies show that your customers are now doing most of 
				their primary research online. You should therefore be 
				aggressive in marketing to them online.
  This is a clear example where business-to-business (B2B) 
				marketers need to learn from their business-to-consumer (B2C) 
				counterparts. The most innovative B2C companies are lead 
				generation machines, leveraging search engine optimization (SEO), 
				viral marketing, and other technically advanced methods. Yet 
				many B2B companies don’t have a clue. 
  The incumbent technology leaders like IBM, Oracle, or SAP, have 
				done very little with regard to marketing automation, search 
				engine optimization, search engine marketing, email marketing or 
				viral marketing. Private SaaS companies have so many 
				disadvantages against the larger incumbent vendors that it is 
				imperative for them to exploit this potential advantage. Whether 
				they use an automated product like Eloqua (as is the case with 
				almost a dozen of our companies) or a team of marketing analysts 
				and spreadsheets, online marketing is simply a must for SaaS 
				companies. 
					
					Constantly trade off cash vs. Growth – If You Must Replenish 
				Supplies While Still Crossing the Desert, Optimize Your Growth 
				Rate (Sales Rep Recruitment and Marketing Spending) So That You 
				Maximize Your Recurring Revenue Run Rate When You Need to 
				Fundraise Next.    There’s no denying that the cash flow characteristics of a SaaS 
				business are wonderful in the long term, but lousy in the short 
				term. The traditional software model with $1 million licensed 
				software and ‘net 60’ payment terms presents a far rosier cash 
				flow picture than monthly subscription streams of $5,000 – 
				$50,000. This means SaaS companies must have impeccable 
				financial stewardship. 
  As a business, it is critical to weigh forward investments 
				carefully. SaaS businesses typically require multiple rounds of 
				investment and a good amount of capital. 
  Top execs must optimize functions around CMRR metrics – the 
				basis for subsequent valuations. If you are planning to raise 
				more funds in nine months, you need to invest in areas that will 
				produce measurable CMRR returns within that nine-month window 
				and often hold back on longer-term initiatives. 
					
					Be Prepared to Cross the Desert – SaaS Requires R&D and 
				Sales Expense Up Front for a Multi-Year Stream of Revenue, So It 
				Demands Enough Investment Capital to Fund 4+ Years of Runway. 
				Load Up for the Long Trip and Pace Your Consumption of Calories!
					 
					 SaaS businesses provide wonderful visibility and predictability 
				at scale, but take lots of time and capital to get to cash flow 
				breakeven over several rounds of fundraising. There are many 
				good SaaS startups that stepped on the gas too early and were 
				wiped out as a result. Always model the business with a 
				comfortable cash cushion and recognize that most SaaS businesses 
				actually consume more short-term cash if you start growing 
				faster. 
				
				Bonus Law: You Can Ignore One of These Rules, but Not More – 
				Great Companies Innovate, but Pick Your Battles 
				You might be reading this and saying to yourself, “Well, our 
				sales model doesn’t match these laws, but I’m sticking with it 
				anyway….” To which we would say, “Go for it!” Nothing is 
				absolute, and we certainly believe it is possible to ignore one 
				of these core tenets and still succeed. Maybe it’s about the 
				ecosystem; maybe it’s the datacenter. Whatever that one 
				exception is – great! We welcome it. Many of our most successful 
				companies historically were able to run against one 
				well-established business principle and exploit this difference 
				successfully. 
				 
				However, if you find yourself questioning several of these Ten 
				Laws, then it’s probably time to step back and take a hard look 
				at your business. As a former SaaS CEO myself and a current SaaS 
				investor, I have learned the hard way that much of the battle is 
				just learning from the mistakes of those who went before you. In 
				our analysis of more than a hundred SaaS businesses, we 
				encountered several successful companies that were on the 
				borderline with one or two of these laws each, but none that 
				challenged several of them. We hope that these laws can help you 
				run your SaaS business more effectively, and we always welcome 
				new insights in these or related areas.
 
 
				Byron Deeter is Partner at Bessemer Venture Partners, a 
				top-tier international venture capital firm with 8 offices 
				worldwide and over $2B of assets under management. He was 
				previously the founding CEO of a Software-as-a-Service business 
				(Trigo Technologies) that was acquired by IBM in 2004, and 
				currently sits on the board of a half-dozen companies, including 
				three pure SaaS companies: Eloqua, Cornerstone OnDemand, and 
				Retail Solutions. For article feedback, contact Byron at
				byron@bvp.com 
         
 
  
  | 
 
 
 | 
 
  
 
 |